花辨直播官方版_花辨直播平台官方app下载_花辨直播免费版app下载

English 中文網(wǎng) 漫畫網(wǎng) 愛新聞iNews 翻譯論壇
中國(guó)網(wǎng)站品牌欄目(頻道)
當(dāng)前位置: Language Tips> 譯通四海> Columnist 專欄作家> Liu Shinan

Public mood is never to be ignored

[ 2009-05-20 13:32]     字號(hào) [] [] []  
免費(fèi)訂閱30天China Daily雙語(yǔ)新聞手機(jī)報(bào):移動(dòng)用戶編輯短信CD至106580009009

Public mood is never to be ignoredTwo incidents that happened recently have caused a sensation across the country.

On May 10, three government workers of Yesanguan township in Badong county, Hubei province, visited an entertainment venue and asked for "special service" from a waitress. When the girl refused, one of the three men - an official - hit her on her head with a wad of money saying "Think I don't have enough money?" while another man said providing special service was her job. The girl argued against the humiliation and tried twice to leave the room but the official pushed her back on the sofa. The girl took up a knife to stab the official to death and injured the other man before surrendering to the police.

The media reports about the event soon caught nationwide attention and the number of online comments reached hundreds of thousands in just a few days. Ninety-nine percent of the comments expressed sympathy for the girl. Many appealed for lenient treatment for her; some even claimed she was innocent and called her "a heroine against rapists." The latest statement announced by the local police, however, differed greatly from the media reports and was so carefully couched that the officials appeared not that guilty.

Public mood is never to be ignored

The other event took place in Hangzhou, Zhejiang province, on May 8, when a speeding car hit and killed a pedestrian at the zebra crossing. The driver was suspected to be racing with fellow young drivers, all believed to be children of rich families. Photos posted online showed the indifference of the driver and his friends at the scene of the accident. Their attitude aroused public anger, which was further fueled by a police statement announcing that the speed of the car was 70 km per hour, 20 km above the limit. Witnesses said the speed must be much higher for the pedestrian had been thrown 5 meters in the air and 20 meters away from the car. The police later changed their statement about the speed but their decision that the driver would be charged with "causing traffic disturbances" rather than "endangering public security" caused more public outcry.

In both cases, the authorities' attitude differed from the public sentiment. Of course, the authorities should be cautious in stating the facts and the cases should be tried by courts before the nature of the incidents are determined. But the authorities should take public sentiment seriously and reflect on why the public were so unanimous in their judgment of the events.

The public sympathized with the waitress in the Hubei case because of, I assume, at least two reasons. First, the Yesanguan township official and his colleagues did intend to force the girl to have sex with them and insulted her before he was killed. The public thought the girl was defending herself. Second, there had recently been quite a number of reports of government officials violating women. For instance, in the "child prostitution" case in Xishui, Guizhou province, a few government workers were involved in forcing underage girls into sex. And media revelation of officials visiting brothels seems to have never ended.

In the Hangzhou case, the public hoped to charge the suspect with a more severe crime because of, also, two reasons. First, the suspect's and his friends' action of racing on streets has caused danger to the public. Second, wealthy people violating laws and escaping punishment by spending money has become quite common in many places. The public strongly resent dirty deals between power and wealth.

In both cases, public opinion may not be totally reasonable and may have been influenced by intuition. But they are not without reason. Legal authorities should be very careful when investigating the facts and giving a verdict. Any inaccurate conclusion about the facts and incorrect verdict may infuriate the public. They are watching and waiting for the result.

E-mail: [email protected]

About the author:

劉式南 高級(jí)編輯。1968年畢業(yè)于武漢華中師范學(xué)院(現(xiàn)華中師范大學(xué))英文系。1982年畢業(yè)于北京體育學(xué)院(現(xiàn)北京體育大學(xué))研究生院體育情報(bào)專業(yè)。1982年進(jìn)入中國(guó)日?qǐng)?bào)社,先后擔(dān)任體育記者、時(shí)政記者、國(guó)際新聞編輯、要聞版責(zé)任編輯、發(fā)稿部主任、《上海英文星報(bào)》總編輯、《中國(guó)商業(yè)周刊》總編輯等職?,F(xiàn)任《中國(guó)日?qǐng)?bào)》總編輯助理及專欄作家。1997年獲國(guó)務(wù)院“特殊貢獻(xiàn)專家政府津貼”。2000年被中華全國(guó)新聞工作者協(xié)會(huì)授予“全國(guó)百佳新聞工作者”稱號(hào)。2006年獲中國(guó)新聞獎(jiǎng)二等獎(jiǎng)(編輯)。

?相關(guān)閱讀:

 

 
中國(guó)日?qǐng)?bào)網(wǎng)英語(yǔ)點(diǎn)津版權(quán)說(shuō)明:凡注明來(lái)源為“中國(guó)日?qǐng)?bào)網(wǎng)英語(yǔ)點(diǎn)津:XXX(署名)”的原創(chuàng)作品,除與中國(guó)日?qǐng)?bào)網(wǎng)簽署英語(yǔ)點(diǎn)津內(nèi)容授權(quán)協(xié)議的網(wǎng)站外,其他任何網(wǎng)站或單位未經(jīng)允許不得非法盜鏈、轉(zhuǎn)載和使用,違者必究。如需使用,請(qǐng)與010-84883631聯(lián)系;凡本網(wǎng)注明“來(lái)源:XXX(非英語(yǔ)點(diǎn)津)”的作品,均轉(zhuǎn)載自其它媒體,目的在于傳播更多信息,其他媒體如需轉(zhuǎn)載,請(qǐng)與稿件來(lái)源方聯(lián)系,如產(chǎn)生任何問(wèn)題與本網(wǎng)無(wú)關(guān);本網(wǎng)所發(fā)布的歌曲、電影片段,版權(quán)歸原作者所有,僅供學(xué)習(xí)與研究,如果侵權(quán),請(qǐng)?zhí)峁┌鏅?quán)證明,以便盡快刪除。
 

關(guān)注和訂閱

本文相關(guān)閱讀

人氣排行

翻譯服務(wù)

中國(guó)日?qǐng)?bào)網(wǎng)翻譯工作室

我們提供:媒體、文化、財(cái)經(jīng)法律等專業(yè)領(lǐng)域的中英互譯服務(wù)
電話:010-84883468
郵件:[email protected]